ERPClimb logoERPClimb
SAP tableObjectEKBNModuleMM_P2P

EKBN table — Purchase Requisition Reporting / Account Assignment Index

EKBN is used by SAP purchase-requisition reporting and dynamic selections, including account-assignment criteria such as WBS element and G/L account exposed by reports such as ME5A. It must not be confused with purchase-order confirmations, which use other purchasing structures. For authoritative purchase-requisition item and account-assignment persistence, validate EKBN reporting results against EBAN and EBKN.

Verified practitioner reference for Purchase Requisition Reporting / Account Assignment Index. It explains the table's real business role, safe keys and joins, proof path, S/4HANA behavior, common misinterpretations, ownership, and related SAP objects.

Published 20 Sept 2026· 546 words

Diese Seite ist noch nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar.

Purpose

EKBN is a purchasing reporting/index structure used around purchase requisitions, particularly when standard selection reports need account-assignment fields. SAP support content references EKBN in ME5A and WBS-element selection scenarios. It is not the purchase-order vendor-confirmation table; the earlier ERPClimb description using PO schedule-line confirmation fields was a semantic error.

Key fields

Exact fields should be confirmed in the target system's DDIC, but purchase-requisition and account-assignment context is the correct semantic frame.

  • BANFN — purchase requisition number.
  • BNFPO — purchase requisition item.
  • ZEBKN or account-assignment sequence context where exposed.
  • SAKTO — G/L account used for account-assignment reporting where present.
  • PS_PSP_PNR and related CO/PS account-assignment fields support WBS/project selections.
  • Date and requisition-selection fields can be carried for standard purchasing-report filtering.

How it joins the data model

Use EBAN as the authoritative purchase-requisition item source and EBKN as the authoritative purchase-requisition account-assignment source. Join by requisition number/item and account-assignment sequence as applicable. PR follow-on purchasing documents can be traced from EBAN/EKPO and purchasing history rather than treating EKBN as the purchase-order document model.

How to read it safely

Treat EKBN as a report/index aid. Reproduce the user's ME5A/ME5K-style selection first, then confirm the requisition item in EBAN and its account assignment in EBKN. If an EKBN-driven filter produces an unexpected WBS result, do not update EKBN manually; verify the original PR account assignment and standard report behavior.

How to prove it in the data

For a purchase requisition that appears under the wrong WBS or G/L selection, capture BANFN/BNFPO from the report, inspect the EKBN selection row, then compare EBAN and EBKN for the same requisition item and account-assignment sequence. SAP has published support content specifically for inconsistent WBS results when filtering EKBN in SE16/SE16N/ME5A, so the authoritative PR data should be part of the proof.

ECC vs S/4HANA

SAP support documentation references EKBN in both ERP and S/4HANA purchase-requisition reporting scenarios. Its role is tied to classic purchasing reporting rather than a new S/4HANA persistence model. For new custom analytics and integrations, prefer released purchase-requisition CDS/API content and authoritative EBAN/EBKN semantics instead of depending on report-index behavior.

Common pitfalls

  • Confusing EKBN with PO confirmations because of the EK* naming family.
  • Confusing EKBN with EBKN; EBKN is the authoritative PR account-assignment table.
  • Updating a reporting/index structure directly to fix a selection discrepancy.
  • Using only WBS display formatting without comparing the internal PS object number.
  • Treating an ME5A selection anomaly as evidence that the purchase requisition itself is wrong.

Whose problem this is

Primary ownership is MM Purchasing, with PS/CO joining when the account assignment is a WBS, order, or cost object. ABAP may be needed for a standard-report/index inconsistency or custom selection logic, but direct database correction is not an appropriate first response.

Related SAP objects

Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.

Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-tables/ekbnERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.