LIS SIS Reporting Replaced by Embedded Analytics
In S/4HANA, the Logistics Information System and Sales Information System still exist technically but are treated as compatibility scope, not a strategic reporting tool. SAP's direction is embedded analytics: CDS-based virtual data model queries reading transactional data live on HANA, exposed through Fiori analytical apps, replacing the periodic statistical update tables and standard/flexible analysis transactions that SIS and LIS relied on in ECC.
This page covers how sales and logistics reporting moved from the classic Logistics Information System and Sales Information System, built on periodically updated info structures, to embedded analytics running live off transactional tables via CDS views. It focuses on what breaks for custom reports and interfaces built on info structures, and what a conversion project must inventory and decide before go-live.
Reviewed by an ERPClimb SAP consultant on 23 Sept 2026· 1,104 words
Esta página aún no está disponible en español.
Classic ECC behaviour
In ECC, operational reporting for sales, purchasing, inventory and production ran through the Logistics Information System, with the Sales Information System as its best-known component alongside Purchasing Info System, Inventory Controlling and the various shop-floor and plant maintenance info systems. Info structures (tables in the S0xx to S9xx range) held pre-aggregated characteristics and key figures, populated from sales orders, deliveries, billing documents, goods movements and purchase orders through update rules maintained per structure. Population happened via V1 (synchronous), V2 (deferred) or V3 (background collective) update, with V3 jobs scheduled centrally and prone to delay under load. Users ran standard analysis transactions against SAP-delivered structures or flexible/self-defined info structures built by the business over the years. Many sites accumulated dozens of custom info structures, each needing its own update rule maintenance, periodic reorganization, and archiving once volumes grew, since the underlying tables were not built for high cardinality retention.
S/4HANA behaviour
LIS and SIS still exist in S/4HANA as compatibility scope. The tables, update rules and standard analysis transactions have not been ripped out, but SAP no longer positions them as the reporting layer, and new development on them is discouraged. The strategic replacement is embedded analytics: CDS-based virtual data model views that aggregate directly from transactional tables at query time on HANA, without a redundant statistical table and without a V1/V2/V3 collector job in between. Reporting is consumed through delivered analytical Fiori apps, custom analytical queries built on CDS, or multidimensional tools pointed at the virtual data model, giving real-time figures instead of figures lagging behind the last successful update run. Custom info structures and their update rules are not automatically converted into anything on the CDS side; each one that still matters has to be rebuilt as a query or app by someone who understands what it was actually used for. Certain industry-specific info systems built on the same LIS technology carry additional simplification restrictions in some scenarios, so availability has to be checked per structure and process area rather than assumed uniform across the LIS family.
Project impact
The practical damage lands on whoever built or relied on custom info structures over the years, plus anything technical that read the S0xx tables directly.
- Long-standing custom standard analysis reports used by sales or purchasing managers stop being maintained, and no one owns the decision to rebuild them until a month-end close surfaces the gap
- Interfaces and downstream Excel or Access tools that select directly from info structure tables break silently if those tables are no longer populated for the relevant scope, or simply go stale
- Authorization roles built around old LIS/SIS transaction codes become dead weight and do not map to the new CDS-based analytics roles, so access has to be rebuilt rather than migrated
- V3 background collective update jobs left running after cutover consume batch resources for consumers that no longer exist, and this often goes unnoticed for months
- Business users trained on drilldown-style standard analysis find the interaction model of Fiori analytical apps unfamiliar, and adoption stalls without dedicated retraining
- BW extraction built on LIS communication structures for the same logistics areas is affected by the same underlying change and needs its own review, not just the front-end reports
Migration actions
The work is inventory first, decisions second, rebuild third, and none of it can be skipped for a conversion with live custom reporting on LIS.
- Inventory every active info structure, standard and self-defined, including who consumes it and how often it is actually used, not just how often it was originally built to be used; this inventory is a pre-conversion gate, not optional cleanup, because it determines what silently stops mattering
- Check the simplification item relevant to the target release for any restriction on the specific info system in use (SIS, PURCHIS, PMIS, QM-IS, and so on), since availability is not identical across all of them
- For each info structure still needed, decide explicitly: keep running in compatibility mode for a defined transition period, or rebuild as an embedded analytics query or Fiori app now
- Rebuild the reports that matter as CDS-based queries or analytical apps and run them side by side with the old figures for at least one full close cycle before cutting business users over
- Migrate authorizations to the new analytics role model rather than trying to reuse old LIS transaction authorizations
- Decommission V3 collective update jobs only after confirming no remaining consumer depends on the populated info structure, and confirm this in writing with the business owner
Whose problem this is
Joint ownership. Functional teams in SD, MM and PP own which figures and KPIs actually matter and must sign off on the replacement report before old ones are switched off. The BW or embedded analytics team owns building the CDS views, queries and Fiori apps. Neither side can complete the cutover alone, and the decision to retire a given info structure needs business sign-off, not just a technical go-ahead.
Common pitfalls
Most of the pain surfaces after go-live, not during testing, because test systems rarely carry the volume or the full set of forgotten custom reports.
- Assuming LIS will keep performing acceptably forever because the tables are still there; these tables are legacy pool structures, not optimized for HANA, and volume growth exposes that gap only in production
- Discovering during the first post-cutover month-end close that a critical manager report was built on a self-defined info structure nobody had documented or included in the inventory
- Leaving V3 collective update jobs scheduled after the consuming reports have been retired, so batch capacity is wasted on updates nobody reads
- Expecting the new CDS-based figure to match the old SIS figure exactly; aggregation timing and rounding logic differ enough that reconciliation differences appear at the first real close and get mistaken for a data error rather than a design difference
- Underestimating how many hidden consumers exist, particularly desktop macros and personal query tools pulling straight from S0xx tables, which only surface once they stop returning data
Take the next diagnostic step
Use these ERPClimb resources to explore the scenario. Verify all actions in your SAP system before making production changes.
- Clean Core Code Check →
Scan custom ABAP for S/4HANA simplification findings by line.
- S/4HANA readiness check →
Assess how ready a landscape is for conversion.
Related SAP objects
Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.
Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-s4hana-changes/lis-and-sis-reporting-replaced-by-embedded-analyticsERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.