ABAP short dumpObjectDBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERRORModuleABAP

DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR — DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR runtime error

DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR is a generic ABAP runtime error raised when the database interface receives an error return code from the underlying database that does not map to one of the more specific DBIF exceptions. It means the database itself rejected or failed a SQL statement issued by an Open SQL or native SQL call, and the real cause sits in the native database error text shown further down in the ST22 dump, not in the ABAP code itself.

This page covers how to read DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR dumps, the database-side conditions that actually trigger it (space exhaustion, deadlocks, connection loss, privilege and encoding problems), and how to separate a Basis-owned database fault from an ABAP query design fault. It also covers the reflex fixes that hide the dump without resolving the underlying database condition.

Published 16 Sept 2026· 1,249 words

What the dump means

DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR belongs to the DBIF_RSQL exception family raised by the ABAP database interface whenever it passes a statement to the database layer and gets back a return code it cannot classify more precisely. Unlike DBIF_RSQL_TABLE_UNKNOWN or DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_REQUEST, which point at something wrong on the ABAP or dictionary side, SQL_ERROR is the catch-all for faults the database itself reports: a rejected statement, a failed commit, an aborted transaction, a resource limit hit inside the DBMS. The ABAP stack trace in the dump tells which program and which Open SQL statement triggered the call, but the decisive information is the native database error text embedded in the dump, which carries the vendor-specific code and message. Reading the ABAP side alone without that native text is reading half the dump.

Root causes that actually produce it

  • Tablespace, segment, or disk space exhaustion: the database cannot extend a table, index, or temp segment to complete the insert or sort operation; this is by far the most common cause in production and shows a database-native 'out of space' or 'unable to extend' message in the dump.
  • Deadlock detected and rolled back by the database: two sessions hold conflicting locks and the database kills one transaction to break the cycle; the native error text will name a deadlock or transaction-rollback condition rather than an ABAP lock object.
  • Database connection lost mid-statement: a network blip, a database restart, a listener timeout, or a connection pool reset during a long-running query causes the statement to fail with a connection-related native code.
  • Database-side resource limits: maximum number of extents reached, cursor limit on the database exceeded, or a session/process limit hit under heavy concurrent load.
  • Authorization or schema-level privilege gaps: a technical database user lacks grant on a table or view, common after a schema copy, a new client, or a tenant refresh where grants were not replicated.
  • Data value rejected by the database: a value too long for the column definition, a numeric value out of the column's range, or a codepage/character-set mismatch that the database refuses to store, distinct from a pure ABAP CONVT dump because the rejection happens on the database side.
  • Index or table corruption at the storage engine level, usually surfacing after an unclean shutdown, a failed reorganization, or storage-layer issues.
  • Statement killed by a database resource manager or DBA intervention, for example a long-running report cancelled by a workload management policy.

What to inspect in ST22

  • Short text and 'What happened' section: confirms this is an unhandled database interface exception, not a program logic error.
  • Database error text block: the single most important part of the dump, containing the vendor-native return code and message, for example an Oracle ORA- code, a HANA SQL error number, or an equivalent from the platform in use; this is what actually explains the failure.
  • ABAP call stack and the source code extract: identifies the exact Open SQL or native SQL statement, the table or view being accessed, and the calling program and line number.
  • System fields: sy-subrc and sy-dbcnt at the point of failure, and the client and user context, to judge whether the failure is isolated to one transaction or systemic.
  • Container / work process information: which database connection, dialog step, and time of day, useful for correlating with a spike in concurrent load.
  • Follow-on checks: DBACOCKPIT or the platform-specific DB monitor for space and session status at the failure timestamp, ST04 for lock waits and deadlock graphs, SM21 system log around the same timestamp for corroborating database or network alerts, and SM50/SM66 if the failure coincided with a work process pile-up.

Resolution path

If the native error text points at space exhaustion, this is a Basis action: extend the tablespace, datafile, or storage volume, and no ABAP change or transport is needed, though a permanent fix may require adjusting auto-extend settings or archiving. If the cause is a deadlock, functional and ABAP teams need to review the locking sequence in the offending program and any concurrent process it collides with; a genuine fix usually means reordering database access or introducing an SAP enqueue lock ahead of the database write, which requires a code change and a transport. If the cause is connection loss, Basis investigates the database and network layer; no code fix applies unless the program needs better commit-and-retry logic around long-running statements, which again is a change request. Privilege gaps are corrected by granting the missing authorization at database schema level, a Basis task with no transport involved. Data-value rejections point back to the ABAP data model or an inbound interface feeding oversized or malformed values, and the fix belongs to the ABAP or interface team as a proper transport. Corruption cases go to Basis/DBA for index rebuild or table repair, sometimes with a system downtime window.

The fix people try first (and why it fails)

The reflex is to wrap the failing Open SQL statement in a TRY CATCH block for the database interface exception class and swallow it, or to restart the work process or the whole instance and consider the incident closed once the dump stops recurring for a while. Both hide the symptom. Catching the exception without inspecting the native error text turns a database-level failure, often data loss or a partial commit, into a silently ignored error, which is worse than the dump. Restarting work processes clears the immediate condition (locked session, exhausted connection) but the space, deadlock, or privilege problem that caused it is untouched and will resurface, usually at a worse moment.

Prevention

Set proactive alerting on tablespace and file system usage thresholds well below the point where the database has to reject an extend request, and review auto-growth settings on all production databases. Run regular deadlock graph review during peak batch windows and correct known lock-order conflicts in custom code before they escalate. Enforce a code standard that any program performing bulk inserts or updates validates value length and range against the dictionary before sending them to the database, and that long-running statements commit in controlled packages rather than one oversized transaction.

Whose problem this is

Split ownership: Basis owns database space, connectivity, privileges, and corruption; ABAP owns query design, locking sequence in custom code, and data value handling. The handover note should carry the native database error code and text from the dump, the table and statement identified in the call stack, the timestamp, whether the failure is isolated or repeating, and which side (space, lock, connection, privilege, data) the native text points to.

Related SAP objects

Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.

Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-abap-dumps/dbif-rsql-sql-errorERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.