SAPSQL_EMPTY_IN_LIST — SAPSQL_EMPTY_IN_LIST runtime error explained
SAPSQL_EMPTY_IN_LIST fires when an Open SQL statement contains a WHERE ... IN (or NOT IN) condition against a range or internal table that has zero rows, in a context the database interface cannot resolve statically - almost always a dynamically built WHERE clause. It is a catchable exception of class CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB; an uncaught instance terminates as this dump.
Covers why SAPSQL_EMPTY_IN_LIST is raised, the dynamic-WHERE-clause and NOT IN patterns that actually trigger it in production code, how to read the ST22 entry for this specific dump, and the code-level fixes that address the cause instead of just catching the exception.
Published 16 Sept 2026· 1,311 words
What the dump means
SAPSQL_EMPTY_IN_LIST is the runtime error behind exception class CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB, raised by the database interface when it encounters an IN or NOT IN condition referencing a selection table or range table with no entries, in a statement variant where the kernel cannot resolve the condition into valid native SQL at the point the statement is parsed. When the IN condition is static and known at compile time, an empty table is normally optimized away quietly - a plain IN against an empty table just returns no rows, no dump. The problem appears when the WHERE clause is assembled dynamically, for example through string concatenation into a dynamic WHERE table, through generated CDS access, or through negated conditions where the semantics of an empty exclusion list are ambiguous. Because the exception class is catchable, the dump only appears when nobody in the call stack has a TRY/CATCH around the statement.
Root causes that actually produce it
- Dynamically built WHERE clause with an unchecked empty range: a custom report concatenates fragments like 'AND matnr IN lt_matnr' into a dynamic WHERE itab, and lt_matnr turns out to be empty for that execution because the corresponding select-option on the screen was left blank. The static compiler cannot optimize a string it never sees, so the empty condition reaches the database interface unresolved and it raises this exception instead of guessing at the intended semantics. This is by far the most frequent cause seen in custom Z-reports and BAdI implementations.
- NOT IN against an empty range or table: a positive IN against an empty table safely means 'select nothing', but a NOT IN against an empty table should mean 'exclude nothing, so select everything'. That reversal cannot always be generated as valid native SQL for every database platform inside a dynamically assembled condition, so the kernel refuses to guess and throws the exception rather than silently returning the wrong result set.
- CDS view or AMDP filter fed an empty parameter table: a consuming program passes an empty internal table into an IN-style filter parameter of a CDS view or an AMDP method, and the generated SQL cannot resolve the filter, surfacing the same exception one layer removed from the calling ABAP code.
- Misapplied FOR ALL ENTRIES-to-IN rewrite: a developer converts a FOR ALL ENTRIES pattern into a range-based IN condition for performance reasons but omits the IS INITIAL guard that FOR ALL ENTRIES logic normally requires, so an empty driver table propagates into the dynamic IN clause instead of short-circuiting the select.
- Generic selection-screen frameworks: reusable selection or variant-handling code builds a WHERE fragment for every field on the screen without first checking whether the associated range table has entries, so blank optional fields generate empty IN fragments on every execution where the user leaves them unfilled.
- RFC or BAPI callers sending an empty range that used to be mandatory: an interface program that used to always populate a filter table now sends it empty under some condition, exposing a code path in the receiving program that was never exercised with an empty table during testing.
What to inspect in ST22
- Short text of the dump: confirms it is specifically the empty IN/NOT IN condition, distinct from other SAPSQL_ or DBIF_RSQL_ errors.
- Exception class shown (CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB or the related dynamic Open SQL exception): confirms this was raised as a catchable exception and nobody upstream caught it.
- Call stack in the ST22 detail: identifies the exact include and line executing the SELECT, and whether it sits inside a function module, a CDS access class, or a generic selection framework.
- Source code extract at the failing line: check whether the WHERE clause is static ABAP syntax or built as a string/dynamic WHERE table; this single check usually tells which of the root causes applies.
- Active variable values at the point of the dump, specifically the range or internal table named in the IN condition: confirm it is genuinely empty and note what upstream logic populated (or failed to populate) it.
- Follow up in SE80 or SE38 on the reporting program to see the full construction of the dynamic WHERE table across prior statements, not just the failing line.
- ST05 SQL trace if the generated statement text itself needs to be seen, useful when the dynamic WHERE is assembled across several includes.
Resolution path
If the cause is a dynamically built WHERE clause with an empty range, add an IS INITIAL check before the fragment is appended to the dynamic WHERE table and skip the fragment entirely when the range has no entries; this is a code change requiring a transport. If the cause is a NOT IN against a potentially empty table, replace the negated dynamic condition with explicit logic that tests IS INITIAL first and either omits the exclusion or constructs the positive equivalent, again a code fix under a change request. If the cause sits in a CDS view or AMDP parameter, validate the parameter table before it reaches the generated SQL layer, in the calling ABAP code rather than inside the CDS definition where validation options are limited. If the cause is an interface sending an empty range where a populated one was assumed, fix the receiving program's defensive check rather than forcing the sender to always populate it, since other callers may legitimately send empty tables. None of these are basis-side or configuration fixes; all require an ABAP change and a transport.
The fix people try first (and why it fails)
The reflex fix is wrapping the offending SELECT in TRY/CATCH INTO cx_sy_open_sql_db and returning an empty internal table on catch, without asking why the range was empty in the first place. This stops the dump but silently changes program behavior: for a positive IN it happens to match the intended 'no data' outcome, but for a NOT IN case it converts 'select everything, nothing excluded' into 'select nothing', which is the opposite of the business requirement and produces wrong results with no error raised at all going forward.
Prevention
Add a code review checkpoint for any dynamically constructed WHERE clause: every fragment built from a range or select-option table must be preceded by an IS INITIAL check before being appended. Prefer the static Open SQL syntax with an inline table, such as WHERE field IN @itab, over string-concatenated dynamic WHERE tables wherever the condition does not genuinely need to be dynamic, since the static form lets the compiler optimize an empty table safely. Unit and regression tests for selection reports should always include a run with every optional select-option left blank.
Whose problem this is
ABAP development owns this dump; it is a logic defect in how a WHERE condition was assembled, not a basis or authorization issue. The handover note to development should include the ST22 call stack, the program and line of the failing SELECT, and the exact input (which selection field was left blank or which upstream table was empty) that reproduces it, so the fix can be tested against the same empty-table scenario before transport.
Related SAP objects
Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.
Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-abap-dumps/sapsql-empty-in-listERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.