SAP tableObjectLTBKModuleWM_EWM

LTBK table — Transfer Requirement Header Table

LTBK is the header table for a transfer requirement in classic Warehouse Management. One row represents one transfer requirement: a request to move a defined quantity of material within a warehouse number, created from a goods movement or manually, waiting to be converted into one or more transfer orders (LTAK/LTAP). It does not exist in decentralized EWM.

This page covers LTBK, the header record for classic WM transfer requirements, and how it sits between goods movement postings and transfer order creation. It focuses on why a transfer requirement stays open, how to distinguish an unprocessed requirement from a completed putaway, and where the table stops being relevant once a site runs EWM instead of classic WM.

Reviewed by an ERPClimb SAP consultant on 15 Sept 2026· 1,004 words

What it stores

A transfer requirement is a request to move stock within a warehouse number before a physical transfer order is created and confirmed. LTBK holds the header: warehouse number, movement type, requirement date and time, and the user or process that generated it. Transfer requirements are typically created automatically when a goods receipt or goods issue is posted in Inventory Management for a storage location under warehouse management, and the relevant movement type is configured for two-step processing (requirement first, transfer order second) rather than immediate transfer order creation. They can also be created manually for internal warehouse moves. Until a transfer order is created and confirmed against it, the stock referenced by the requirement sits in an interim area, logically requested to move but not yet physically relocated.

Key fields

  • MANDT - client
  • TBNUM - transfer requirement number, the key linking header to items and to any downstream transfer order reference
  • LGNUM - warehouse number the requirement belongs to
  • BWLVS - movement type that generated or governs the requirement
  • BDATU - date the requirement was created
  • BZEIT - time the requirement was created
  • ERNAM - user or background process that created the requirement

How it joins the data model

  • LTBK-TBNUM = LTBP-TBNUM to reach the requirement's item lines: material, quantity, source and destination storage type and bin proposals
  • LTBP-TBNUM = LTAP-TBNUM (with LTBP-TBPOS = LTAP-TBPOS on installations that populate it) to trace which transfer order item was created to fulfil a given requirement item
  • LTBK-LGNUM = T300-LGNUM to validate the warehouse number and read its control parameters
  • LTBP joins to LAGP and LQUA indirectly through the storage type and bin fields once a transfer order has actually moved the stock, since the requirement itself carries proposed locations, not confirmed ones

How to read it safely

Always restrict by MANDT and LGNUM first; a warehouse number can carry a large volume of historical requirements if the site does not archive. TBNUM is the most selective field once known, typically obtained from a goods movement document or from the item table LTBP rather than guessed. Do not scan LTBK by date range alone across all warehouse numbers in a productive client; the table can be large in high-throughput sites and an unrestricted date-only selection is expensive. If chasing a specific material movement, go through LTBP first to filter by material or plant-relevant fields, then pull the matching TBNUM back into LTBK for the header context.

How to prove it in the data

Symptom: a goods receipt posted but the material has not appeared in the final storage bin. Selection: query LTBP for the material and warehouse number to find the TBNUM, then read LTBK for that TBNUM to confirm the requirement exists and check its creation date and movement type. If a matching transfer order is not found in LTAK/LTAP for the same TBNUM, the requirement is still open and the stock is sitting in the interim area, not lost.

ECC vs S/4HANA

LTBK is part of classic Warehouse Management, which remains technically available in S/4HANA for sites that have not migrated to embedded or decentralized EWM. Its structure has not materially changed. SAP's strategic direction for new warehouse implementations is EWM, where this table has no equivalent; warehouse requests and tasks replace the transfer requirement and transfer order model entirely. No compatibility CDS view mapping LTBK data forward into an EWM structure should be assumed to exist.

Common pitfalls

  • Assuming every goods movement in a WM-managed storage location creates an LTBK entry. Only movement types configured for two-step processing generate a standing requirement; movement types set for immediate transfer order creation skip straight to LTAK/LTAP and LTBK may never be populated for that posting.
  • Treating an open LTBK row as evidence stock is missing. It usually means stock is sitting in an interim storage type awaiting a transfer order, not that the goods movement failed.
  • Confusing the transfer requirement with the transfer order. LTBK/LTBP describe a request; LTAK/LTAP describe the actual movement instruction and confirmation. Checking only LTBK will not show whether putaway or picking actually happened.
  • Expecting LTBK to exist at all in a decentralized EWM installation. EWM uses warehouse requests and warehouse tasks, not classic transfer requirements; this table is only relevant where classic WM is still active, whether in ECC or in an S/4HANA system still running classic WM.
  • Deleting or archiving LTBK rows manually to clear backlog. Unprocessed requirements should be resolved through the normal transfer order creation transaction or investigated for a configuration issue on the movement type, not removed at table level.
  • Assuming TBNUM is unique across warehouse numbers without checking LGNUM. The requirement number is only meaningful together with the warehouse number key.

Whose problem this is

The warehouse or logistics execution functional consultant owns configuration questions about which movement types generate a transfer requirement versus an immediate transfer order. Inventory management or MM functional consultants get involved when the trigger is a goods movement posting rather than a manual warehouse transfer. Basis is only relevant if the table's size is driving an archiving or performance conversation.

Related SAP objects

Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.

Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-tables/ltbkERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.