PBIM table — PBIM - Independent Requirements Material Header
PBIM holds one header row per material/plant combination for which planned independent requirements (PIRs) exist under classic Demand Management. It carries no quantities itself - it stores the internal planning object number that links the material/plant to its periodic requirement quantities in PBED and consumption values in PBIC.
PBIM is the anchor table behind classic SAP Demand Management, created once per material/plant when independent requirements first exist. This page covers what the header row actually proves, how it joins to PBED and PBIC, and the common mistake of reading a PBIM row as evidence of active demand.
Published 16 Sept 2026· 977 words
What it stores
One row of PBIM represents the basic-data header for an independent requirements object at a material/plant level - created the first time Demand Management generates a planned independent requirement or a planning strategy triggers demand for that material at that plant. The row's only real content is an internally generated planning object number that ties the material/plant to the actual periodic quantities stored in PBED and to the consumption values recorded in PBIC. PBIM never stores a date, a quantity, or a version by itself. Because the object number is created once and rarely removed, a PBIM row surviving in the table does not mean the requirement it once represented is still open, active, or even non-zero; it can equally be a fossil left after a PIR was fully consumed or manually zeroed out.
Key fields
- MANDT - client
- MATNR - material number for which the independent requirement object was created
- WERKS - plant the requirement object belongs to
- PAOBJNR - internally generated planning object number; the technical key that links this material/plant header to its periodic quantity rows in PBED and consumption rows in PBIC
How it joins the data model
- PBIM-PAOBJNR = PBED-PAOBJNR joins the header to every periodic requirement record (date, requirements version, planned quantity) for that material/plant
- PBIM-PAOBJNR = PBIC-PAOBJNR joins the header to the consumption values posted against those requirements by sales orders or goods movements
- PBIM-MATNR = MARA-MATNR and PBIM-WERKS = MARC-WERKS bring in the material master and plant-level MRP settings for the same material/plant
- There is no direct field join from PBIM to a planned order in PLAF; the link is procedural - the MRP run reads the open PBED quantities under a PBIM object and creates or updates PLAF records, the two sides only appear together in the stock/requirements list built from MDKP and MDTB
How to read it safely
Always restrict by MANDT first, then by WERKS and MATNR - the table is not enormous but every material that has ever run under a planning strategy or received a manual PIR ends up with a row, so an unrestricted client-wide select is wasteful and unnecessary. PAOBJNR is a technical number generated by the system; nobody knows it in advance, so it is never a usable entry criterion, only an output to carry forward into PBED or PBIC. Do not treat the number of PBIM rows for a plant as a measure of active planning volume - it counts objects ever created, not objects currently carrying open demand.
How to prove it in the data
Symptom: a planner insists a material never had a planned independent requirement, but the stock/requirements list shows historical PIR activity for it. Selection: read PBIM on MATNR and WERKS to get PAOBJNR, then select PBED on that PAOBJNR ordered by date and requirements version. If every quantity field on the PBED rows is zero or the version is inactive, the PIR existed and was later consumed or reduced to zero rather than never having been created - the PBIM header is the leftover proof.
ECC vs S/4HANA
PBIM continues to exist in S/4HANA in the same shape and has not been replaced by a compatibility CDS view the way many transactional tables have. Wherever classic Demand Management - PIR maintenance through the standard planned independent requirement transactions and planning strategies - is still in use, PBIM together with PBED and PBIC remains the unchanged storage layer underneath it, regardless of which newer planning tools sit on top for other scenarios.
Common pitfalls
- Treating the presence of a PBIM row as proof that active demand currently exists for a material/plant - it only proves an object was created at some point, not that it still carries open quantity
- Querying PBIM for quantities or dates and finding nothing - those fields live in PBED, not in PBIM, the header carries only the linking object number
- Assuming PAOBJNR is a meaningful, portable business key - it is an internal number with no cross-client or cross-system consistency, never hardcode it in an interface or compare it between systems
- Confusing PBIM with product allocation master data because of the PB prefix - PBIM belongs to classic Demand Management independent requirements, not to the SD product allocation/quota tables
- Reading an orphaned PBIM row with no children in PBED as data corruption - resetting or deleting PIRs through the normal transactions routinely leaves the header behind, this is expected housekeeping debris, not an error unless MRP actually fails processing it
- Using PBIM row counts across plants to estimate how many materials are actively planned - the count overstates scope because it includes long-expired or fully consumed requirement objects alongside genuinely open ones
Whose problem this is
Data questions on PBIM belong to the PP demand planning consultant or the MRP controller, since the table is generated purely by system processing of independent requirements rather than by direct user master-data entry. Functional consultants read it to trace requirement history; basis and data governance teams have no reason to touch or steward it directly.
Related SAP objects
Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.
Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-tables/pbimERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.