SAP transaction codeObjectLT22ModuleWM_EWM

LT22 — Display Transfer Orders List

LT22 is the classic SAP WM transaction that lists transfer orders matching a selection (warehouse, TO number range, material, movement type, storage type, confirmation status). It never displays a single TO directly the way LT21 does; even a one-record match returns as a list that must be drilled into. It is a pure display transaction, nothing is created or changed.

This page covers LT22, the classic Warehouse Management transaction used to search and list transfer orders by warehouse, storage type, material, or confirmation status. It focuses on why the list-only behavior confuses users expecting a single-document display, and on the diagnostic order for empty results, performance issues, and header-versus-item status mismatches.

Reviewed by an ERPClimb SAP consultant on 15 Sept 2026· 1,018 words

What it does

LT22 displays a list of transfer orders in classic SAP Warehouse Management, selected by warehouse number, TO number range, material, movement type, storage type, or confirmation status. It is a pure reporting transaction: no data is created or changed here. The structural fact that causes most of the confusion is that LT22 does not display a single transfer order the way LT21 does; it always returns a list, even if the selection matches only one document. Consultants who type in a specific TO number expecting the detail screen instead get a one-line list and have to double-click into it to reach the same screen LT21 would have opened directly. LT22 exists to find transfer orders across a warehouse, not to inspect one already known.

When it is used

LT22 is reached for during monitoring and triage rather than during the transactional flow of picking or putaway. A warehouse supervisor uses it to find all open, unconfirmed transfer orders for a storage type before a shift change, or to check whether a batch of TOs generated overnight by a wave or a background job actually got created. It is also the fallback when a delivery is stuck and the exact TO number is unknown: search by movement type and creation date instead. In EWM-based warehouses this monitoring role is taken over by the warehouse monitor; LT22 only applies where classic WM is still active. Fiori coverage for classic WM is limited, so this remains a SAP GUI-only tool in most landscapes.

How to use it

  • Call LT22 and enter the warehouse number, which is mandatory.
  • Narrow by TO number range if known, otherwise leave it open and filter by material, movement type, storage type, or creation date.
  • Set the confirmation status filter to open only, confirmed only, or all; this field is most often left at a default that hides what the user is actually looking for.
  • Execute and review the resulting list; sort or further filter within the grid.
  • Double-click a line to drill into the transfer order detail, equivalent to LT21.
  • From the detail screen, jump to confirmation (LT03 or LT12) or print (LT23) if authorized.

Key fields

  • LTAK - transfer order header: warehouse number, TO number, creation date, confirmation status, movement type.
  • LTAP - transfer order item: source and destination storage type and bin, quantity, material, confirmed quantity.
  • LQUA - quant table, referenced when cross-checking whether the stock behind an open TO still matches physical stock.
  • LT22 itself writes nothing to these tables; it only reads them, since it is a display-only transaction.

How to prove it in the data

Open LTAK in SE16N, filter on the warehouse number field and the confirmation status field, and add a date range on the creation date if the result set is large. To check whether a TO that LT22 still shows as open has actually been partially worked, join to LTAP on warehouse number and TO number and compare the requested quantity against the confirmed quantity; a mismatch there, rather than the header status, is usually what explains an apparently stuck TO.

ECC vs S/4HANA

Where classic Warehouse Management is still active on S/4HANA, LT22 behaves exactly as it did on ECC; there is no functional change and no dedicated Fiori replacement, since Fiori coverage for classic WM monitoring is thin. For warehouses migrated to embedded EWM, LT22 does not apply at all; the equivalent monitoring task is done through the EWM warehouse monitor, which is built on a different object model, not LTAK and LTAP.

Common pitfalls

  • Empty result set: wrong warehouse number, a date range that excludes the target TOs, or a confirmation status filter set to confirmed when the ones sought are still open. Check the status filter first, it is the most common miss.
  • Expecting single-document display: entering one TO number and getting a one-line list is normal behavior, not a bug; drill in rather than assuming the transaction is broken.
  • Performance on wide selections: running LT22 across a full date range with no storage type or movement type restriction on a high-volume warehouse produces a long-running selection against LTAK and LTAP; narrow the selection before escalating to Basis as a performance problem.
  • Authorization-trimmed results: a user with storage-type-level WM authorization restrictions sees fewer rows than a colleague running the identical selection; compare authorization profiles before assuming a data problem.
  • Archived transfer orders missing: TOs cleared by archiving no longer appear in LT22; the archive information system, not LT22, is where closed history beyond the retention window is found.
  • Header status versus item status mismatch: a TO can show as open at header level while individual items are already confirmed; check the item-level confirmed quantities in LTAP before concluding the whole TO is genuinely stuck.

Whose problem this is

This is a functional WM problem in essentially all cases; the transaction itself never fails technically, only the selection or the underlying data does. ABAP involvement is limited to custom selection variants or added authorization checks. A handover to the WM consultant should include the exact selection criteria used, the warehouse number, and whether the missing TOs are expected to be open, confirmed, or archived.

Related SAP objects

Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.

Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-tcodes/lt22ERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.