SCOT — SAPconnect Administration for Outbound Communication
SCOT is the SAPconnect administration transaction used to configure how the system sends documents out - email, fax, X.400 - by defining communication nodes, address areas, and the RFC or ICM destination each node uses. It does not send or monitor anything itself; live send status and errors are checked in SOST, and actual transport happens through a background job.
This page covers SCOT, the SAPconnect configuration transaction that sits behind every outgoing SAP email or fax. It focuses on the node/job/monitor separation that trips up most first-time troubleshooting, and gives a diagnostic sequence for stuck or failed outbound documents.
Reviewed by an ERPClimb SAP consultant on 15 Sept 2026· 1,207 words
Purpose
SCOT is the administration screen for SAPconnect, the layer that routes SAPoffice documents out of the system to external recipients through email, fax, X.400, or RFC-based channels. It defines communication nodes: named configurations that pair a channel type with an address area and a destination, usually an RFC destination pointing at an external gateway or an ICM service handling SMTP directly. The structural fact that explains most confusion: SCOT only configures. It does not process the queue and it does not show whether a specific mail went out. Sending is done by a periodic background job that picks up entries from the send request queue, and the result of each attempt is visible only in SOST. Consultants who open SCOT expecting to see failed mails are looking in the wrong transaction.
When it is used
SCOT is used during initial setup of outbound email or fax, whenever a new SMTP relay, fax gateway, or RFC destination needs to be attached to a node, and whenever the default node needs to change, for example after an infrastructure migration to a new mail relay. It is also reached for during incident triage when business notifications, workflow mails, or output-managed forms are not reaching recipients, as the first check to confirm the node still points at a live destination. It is not used for day-to-day monitoring of individual sends; that role belongs to SOST. There is no Fiori app replacing SCOT; it remains a backend configuration transaction used exclusively by Basis or technical administrators.
How to use it in practice
- Call SCOT and select the node relevant to the channel in question (Internet node for SMTP mail, fax node, or RFC node).
- Double-click the node to open its configuration and check the address area, the assigned RFC destination or ICM service, and the supported document types.
- Set the node as the default node for its address area if it is meant to handle all mail of that type.
- Use the node's test function to send a connectivity test and confirm the destination responds.
- Schedule or verify the periodic send job from the SCOT menu; this is the job that actually drains the queue.
- Send a real test document from the business side and check its status and error text in SOST.
Key data objects
- SAPconnect node customizing table - node ID, node type, address area, and the RFC or ICM destination assigned to that node.
- TBTCO and TBTCP - background job header and step records for the periodic job SCOT schedules to process the outbound queue; visible in SM37 by job name.
- SAPoffice send request tables - hold each outbound document's recipient, assigned node, and current status until the job consumes them; the same records surface as line items in SOST.
- Application log entries under the SAPconnect log object - written whenever a node reports a transport-level failure, readable through SLG1.
How to prove it in the data
Start in SOST, not in a table browse: filter by date range and status to isolate red or yellow send requests, open one, and read the error text, which usually names the node and the transport failure. Cross-check SM37 for the periodic SAPconnect job to confirm it actually ran in that window rather than being stopped or overlapping with a prior run. If the error text points at connectivity rather than content, run the node test again from SCOT and check the underlying RFC destination with a connection test, or the ICM service status, for the actual transport error rather than guessing from the SOST text alone.
ECC vs S/4HANA
The SAPconnect architecture is unchanged on S/4HANA; SCOT and SOST remain the configuration and monitoring pair with no dedicated Fiori replacement. What has shifted is upstream: more outbound documents now originate from newer output management and form frameworks rather than classic SAPscript, but they still funnel through the same nodes and the same queue once they reach SAPconnect. Fax and X.400 nodes are largely legacy at this point; SMTP over an ICM service is the default channel in current implementations.
Common pitfalls and how to diagnose them
- Wrong or missing default node - a send request with no node explicitly resolved falls back to whatever node is flagged default for its address area; if that node is misconfigured or points at a decommissioned gateway, mail silently accumulates in the queue with no obvious error until someone checks SOST.
- Job not scheduled or job dead - SOST shows requests stuck in a waiting status indefinitely; the fix is not to keep creating new send attempts but to check SM37 for the periodic job, confirm it is released and running, and only then let it drain the backlog.
- Destination down at transport level - the node test in SCOT fails or times out; the root cause is usually an expired certificate, a changed relay hostname, or a blocked port, verified with a connection test on the underlying RFC destination or by checking the ICM service status rather than by repeatedly re-testing the node itself.
- Address type mismatch on the recipient - a user's communication type in their own data does not match what the node expects (for example an internal-only address routed through an external SMTP node), producing a send failure that looks like a node problem but is actually master data.
- Attachment or size limit rejection - large attachments bounce at the external relay, not inside SAP; the SOST error text usually names a size or content-type rejection, and the reflex fix of resending repeatedly only multiplies the queue without resolving anything.
- Manual deletion of stuck entries - clearing failed send requests directly from SOST without capturing the error text first destroys the only diagnostic trail for that document and makes the underlying node or destination problem invisible for the next occurrence.
Whose problem this is
SCOT itself is Basis territory: node configuration, RFC destination health, and ICM service status. Functional teams own why a particular business document was supposed to trigger a mail in the first place, which is an output determination question, not a SCOT question. A clean handover from functional to Basis includes the SOST status and error text, the node name involved, the business document number, and the timestamp of the failed attempt.
Related SAP objects
Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.
Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-tcodes/scotERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.