ABAP short dumpObjectTSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORYModuleABAP

TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY — TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY memory exhaustion dump

TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY means a work process asked the kernel for another memory block and none was available across roll area, extended memory, and heap. It is a resource-exhaustion dump, not a logic error, and cannot be caught in ABAP. Cause is almost always an internal table that grew without limit, an unbounded SELECT, or undersized memory parameters for the actual data volume.

This page covers the TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY runtime error, the memory-exhaustion dump raised when the kernel cannot service a request for another allocation block. It ranks the real-world causes from runaway custom code to genuine parameter undersizing, and gives the ST22 reading order and the branching fix path so the correct owner - development or Basis - acts on the correct cause.

Published 16 Sept 2026· 1,320 words

What the dump means

TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY is a runtime error raised when the ABAP kernel cannot allocate a new memory block for the running work process because the configured memory pools are exhausted, not just roll area but usually extended memory and the heap behind it. It belongs to the family of TSV_TNEW_* memory dumps that fire when the memory management layer tries to hand a program the next block it requested, typically to grow an internal table, extend a string, or push a new work area, and finds nothing left to give. The 'TSV' prefix reflects the internal table space vector the kernel uses to track allocated blocks. This is a resource-exhaustion dump, not a logic exception; it cannot be caught with TRY/CATCH. The work process's current request is terminated mid-statement, so whatever the program was doing at that line is simply abandoned.

Root causes that actually produce it

  • Unbounded internal table growth in custom code - a SELECT without a WHERE clause, or a loop that appends to an internal table without limit, keeps requesting new blocks until the work process memory ceiling is hit. This is the single most common cause in productive systems.
  • Missing package processing on mass data jobs - background reports built with FOR ALL ENTRIES or open cursors that pull an entire result set into memory in one shot instead of processing in chunks with a package size and intermediate commits.
  • String or internal table concatenation inside a loop - repeated CONCATENATE or APPEND operations force the kernel to reallocate and copy an ever-growing object each iteration, creating memory pressure well before the logical data volume looks large.
  • Recursive function or method calls without a firm exit condition - each recursion level consumes another memory block on the call stack until the pool of available blocks is gone.
  • Objects and internal tables never released - ALV output tables, RFC destinations, or dynamically created data references that stay in session memory because FREE or CLEAR was never called, especially across repeated executions within one logon session or one background job chain.
  • Extended memory and roll parameters undersized for actual workload - the profile parameters controlling per-user extended memory quota and the shared extended memory pool are set below what a well-written program needs for current data volumes.
  • Memory pressure from parallel processing - several background or dialog work processes running memory-heavy jobs at the same time exhaust the shared extended memory pool even though no single job is individually oversized.
  • Operating system level exhaustion - the paging file or swap space backing the SAP memory areas is full, usually because other processes on the same host are competing for the same physical memory.

What to inspect in ST22

  • Category and short text at the top of the dump - confirms this is the TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY variant rather than a related TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED or SYSTEM_NO_ROLL dump, which point to slightly different memory pools.
  • Where terminated - program name, include, and line number; this is the statement requesting the block that could not be granted, almost always an APPEND, INSERT, CONCATENATE, or an implicit table extension inside a SELECT loop.
  • What happened / error analysis text - states which memory resource was exhausted, roll, extended memory or heap, and gives requested versus available size at the point of failure.
  • Memory usage section further down the dump - shows extended memory and roll area already consumed by the work process before it died; a very high figure tied to one program points to that program, a moderate figure with the system-wide pool full points to configuration or contention.
  • SAP internal call stack - identifies whether the allocation happened inside custom code, a standard function module, or a BAdI or user exit, narrowing the fix to development, standard SAP, or configuration.
  • Follow-on transactions - ST02 for extended memory configuration and consumption trend, SM50 or SM66 to check whether other work processes were also memory-heavy at the same timestamp, ST22 filtered by user and timeframe to see if the dump is a one-off or a recurring pattern.

Resolution path

If the cause is unbounded table growth or missing package processing in custom ABAP, the fix belongs to development: add a WHERE clause or selection criteria, introduce package size processing with intermediate commits, or add a hard cap with an early exit; this requires a transport through the normal change request process, Basis cannot patch it. If the cause is a concatenation pattern or unreleased objects, refactor to use string templates or add FREE and CLEAR at the right points, again a development fix requiring a change request. If the cause is recursion without an exit condition, add or correct the terminating condition. If the cause is genuinely undersized parameters for an otherwise well-written workload, Basis increases extended memory and roll parameters through the profile maintenance transaction, tests in a non-productive instance, and schedules an instance restart to apply; this is an infrastructure change, not a code fix. If the cause is contention from parallel jobs, reschedule background jobs to avoid overlap or add capacity, a Basis and job-scheduling action with no code change. Raising memory parameters without first confirming the code is not leaking only delays recurrence.

The fix people try first (and why it fails)

The reflex is to ask Basis to raise the extended memory and roll parameters and move on. This works immediately because the dump stops appearing for weeks or months, which makes it look like a fix. It is not one: a program that grows an internal table without limit or leaks objects across executions will hit the new, larger ceiling eventually, usually with a bigger production dataset and worse timing than the first occurrence. Meanwhile the enlarged memory footprint of one badly behaved program now competes with every other process for the same expanded shared pool, making unrelated jobs more fragile in the interim.

Prevention

Make WHERE clauses and package size limits a coding standard for any custom program reading mass data, and check for it in code review before transport. Watch ST02 trend graphs for extended memory swap and in and out rates rather than waiting for a dump to surface the problem. Run memory profiling with the runtime analysis tools on any report processing large datasets before it reaches production. Set an early warning alert on extended memory consumption per work process. Enforce FREE and CLEAR discipline for large internal tables and objects at the end of subroutines, particularly in reports executed repeatedly within one session.

Whose problem this is

ABAP development owns any occurrence traceable to custom code; the fix is a coding change requiring a transport. Basis owns memory parameter sizing and system-wide monitoring, and any parameter increase requires an instance restart. The handover note should include the ST22 dump identifier, the program, include and line number, the memory usage figures shown in the dump, and whether ST02 shows the pool exhausted system-wide or only for the one work process involved.

Related SAP objects

Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.

Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-abap-dumps/tsv-tnew-blocks-no-roll-memoryERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.