TSV_TNEW_OCCURS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY — Internal Table Ran Out Of Roll Memory
TSV_TNEW_OCCURS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY means an ABAP internal table tried to grow and the work process could not get more roll or extended memory for it. It is almost always caused by an internal table that expands without limit, not by a genuinely undersized system, though undersized quotas make a marginal program fail sooner.
This page covers the TSV_TNEW_OCCURS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY short dump, which fires when an internal table exceeds the memory quota available to the work process during an APPEND, INSERT or SELECT INTO TABLE. It walks through the causes ranked by how often they actually occur, what to read in ST22 before touching any profile parameter, and why raising memory limits is usually a deferral rather than a fix.
Published 16 Sept 2026· 1,203 words
What the dump means
This is a resource-shortage runtime error, not a coding-syntax error. TNEW is the internal table management layer under the classic OCCURS-style table implementation. The dump fires when that layer tries to extend a table's storage and the request for additional roll memory (the quota assigned to the current session before the process falls back to extended memory or heap) cannot be satisfied. The table itself is not corrupted and the statement that triggered it is usually syntactically fine; the problem is purely that the requested block of memory does not exist within the limits configured for that work process or session. It differs from TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED, which is the equivalent failure one memory tier up, and from SYSTEM_NO_ROLL, which is about the process's own roll area rather than a specific table's growth.
Root causes that actually produce it
- Unbounded internal table growth from custom code: a SELECT INTO TABLE without a restrictive WHERE clause, or a loop that appends rows with no exit condition, builds a table far larger than the business case requires. This is the single most common cause and shows up in reports, background jobs and interfaces alike.
- Cartesian-style multiplication inside nested loops: APPEND statements inside a loop that iterates over another table without a matching key check, producing row counts that multiply rather than add.
- Per-session extended memory quota too low for a legitimate large-volume job: the parameter controlling how much extended memory a single session may claim is reached even though the system-wide extended memory pool still has headroom. Batch jobs processing large data volumes are the usual victims.
- System-wide extended memory pool exhausted: several memory-heavy dialog sessions or batch jobs running concurrently consume the shared pool, so even a normally well-behaved program cannot get its allocation.
- Heap memory fallback disabled or capped too low for the work process type: once the extended memory quota is hit, the process should be able to spill into heap, but if the heap parameter for that work process class is zero or very small, the dump happens immediately instead of degrading gracefully.
- Long-running interactive session holding large tables without freeing them: a user session accumulates internal tables across multiple screen calls and eventually cannot extend one of them.
- Legacy 32-bit addressing limits on older kernels, where a single work process cannot address enough memory regardless of physical RAM installed. Rare on current systems but still seen on old installations.
What to inspect in ST22
- Runtime error category and short text at the top of the dump, confirming this is the roll-memory variant and not TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED or TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY.
- Where terminated: the program, include and exact line number of the APPEND, INSERT, MODIFY or SELECT statement that triggered the extension. This points straight at the offending internal table.
- The memory usage summary near the bottom of the dump, which shows the roll, extended memory and heap figures at the moment of termination. This tells whether the quota exhausted was per-session or system-wide.
- The size the table had reached and the size it was trying to grow to, when shown; a table already at several hundred thousand rows before failing is a strong sign of runaway growth rather than a sizing problem.
- The ABAP call stack, checking for recursive calls or a loop nested inside another loop over the same or a related table.
- Cross-check in ST02 for extended memory pool usage and swap counts around the timestamp of the dump, and in SM21 for concurrent memory-heavy jobs at the same time.
Resolution path
If the cause is a genuinely runaway internal table, the fix is in the program: add a restrictive WHERE clause, process data in packages using a cursor instead of loading everything at once, delete adjacent duplicates or unneeded rows as soon as possible, and free the table explicitly after use. This requires an ABAP change and a transport, and should be treated as a defect fix, not a workaround. If the cause is a legitimate high-volume job hitting a per-session quota that is genuinely too conservative for the business process, Basis raises the relevant extended memory quota parameter after checking there is real headroom in the system-wide pool; this needs a profile parameter change and usually an instance restart, and should be sized deliberately, not doubled blindly. If heap fallback is disabled for the relevant work process class, Basis enables or raises it, again via profile parameter and restart. If the cause is system-wide memory pressure from concurrent jobs, the fix is scheduling: spread memory-intensive jobs across time windows or job classes rather than changing any limit.
The fix people try first (and why it fails)
The reflex fix is to raise the extended memory or roll parameter and move on, because the dump looks like a hardware ceiling. This defers the failure to a larger row count without addressing why the table grew that large in the first place. The program keeps its unbounded SELECT or unchecked nested loop, now consumes more of the shared memory pool per execution, and can starve other concurrent sessions instead of dumping cleanly. When data volume grows further, the same dump returns, usually during a peak period, and by then the parameter has already been pushed once and looks like it 'should be enough'.
Prevention
Enforce restrictive WHERE clauses and package-based processing for any SELECT expected to return large volumes, and require explicit FREE or CLEAR on large internal tables once they are no longer needed. Use code inspector or ABAP Test Cockpit checks that flag unbounded APPEND inside nested loops. Track extended memory trends in ST02 over time rather than only reacting to a dump, and review any batch job whose row counts have grown steadily release over release, since the dump often arrives only after months of quiet growth.
Whose problem this is
ABAP development owns it when the dump traces to a specific program building an oversized table; that is the majority of cases. Basis owns it only when the ST22 memory summary shows the system-wide pool was already exhausted independent of any single runaway program. The handover note should state the program, table, and row count at failure, the memory figures from the dump, and whether the same job has run without incident at lower volumes.
Related SAP objects
Reviewed pages this object connects to in the ERPClimb knowledge graph.
Source: ERPClimb — https://erpclimb.com/sap-abap-dumps/tsv-tnew-occurs-no-roll-memoryERPClimb is an independent platform and is not affiliated with SAP SE. Reference pages are written and reviewed by SAP consultants for learning and troubleshooting.